The terms "Claymore" and "broadsword" can sometimes be used interchangeably, causing confusion. However, historically and technically, there are some distinctions between the two:

1. Origins and Cultural Context: The Claymore is primarily associated with Scotland, particularly the late Medieval and Renaissance periods. It was a Scottish two-handed sword used by Highland warriors. On the other hand, the term "broadsword" is a broader term that refers to various types of swords characterized by a wide blade and versatility. Broadswords were used in different regions and time periods, including Europe.
2. Design and Blade Characteristics: The Claymore typically had a longer blade compared to other broadswords. It featured a straight, double-edged blade with a significant taper, becoming narrower towards the tip. The Claymore's blade was typically around 55 to 60 inches (140 to 152 cm) in length. In contrast, a broadsword, in general, refers to a sword with a broad blade and can encompass various designs, including single-handed and hand-and-a-half swords.
3. Grips and Usage: The Claymore had a distinctive hilt design with a large, often spherical pommel and a straight crossguard. It was designed for two-handed use, providing greater reach and power. The Claymore was primarily used for heavy cutting and thrusting attacks. In contrast, broadswords can refer to swords designed for both one-handed and two-handed use, depending on the specific type and purpose.

It's worth noting that the term "Claymore" has sometimes been used more broadly to refer to any Scottish sword, regardless of size or design. Additionally, terminology and naming conventions can vary, leading to some overlap and confusion.

Overall, the key distinctions between a Claymore and a broadsword lie in their historical origins, specific design characteristics, and cultural associations.